- Running Dry
- Natan Doron
- 30 August 2012
To what extent does the type and delivery of information presented to citizens impact on their willingness to pay for protection of natural habitats?
Running Dry examines this question through the issue of public attitudes to river protection. At a time when excessive abstraction is damaging the long-term health of Britain’s rivers and their ecosystems, this study asks whether people are willing to pay extra on their annual bills to protect them.
By investigating the impact of social and environmental information, and the role of government and industry in providing it, this report highlights how the use of different information affects different environmental arguments.
In demonstrating how public support can shift through the framing of arguments, this study makes an important intervention in the debate around the challenges facing our society in terms of the health of natural habitats, shared responsibility and the preservation of our resources.
Join the Fabian Society today and help shape the future of the left
You’ll receive the quarterly Fabian Review and at least four reports or pamphlets each year sent to your door
Be a part of the debate at Fabian conferences and events and join one of our network of local Fabian societiesJoin the Fabian Society
Be the first to know
Sign up to the free Fabian Society newsletter
Find out about the latest Fabian Society research, publications and events with our regular updatesSign up today